|
 INFORMATION
It is a question provided with certain social hypocrisy. To the question: Porqué is the young people violent? It would be necessary to answer: And because they should not of it being, were not they it his parents and his grandparents? Is not the violence such an ancient and necessary component of the human society like the concord, necessarily in the opposition to tyrannies and claims? A society devoid of any slight sign of violence would be an inert society. It is not a perverse, inexplicable phenomenon come from a diabolical world, but a component of our condition that must be compensated and mitigated rationally by the use of other not less natural impulses like the cooperation, the concord...
It is an error to think that the young people would not cultivate violent fantasies if they were not inculcated by television. For the same rule, it might affirm the opposite, that this one satisfies our demoniacal impulses. Such expositions violate the first sanity norm: to separate the fantasy of the reality, and they forget a lesson that goes back up to Platón: that the difference between the evil thing and the just thing is that the first one carries out the misconducts that the second one only dreams and discards.
There is said "it is necessary to teach that the violence must never be answered by the violence". This is flatly false, and nothing is gained teaching falsities. On the contrary, it is necessary to tell that the violence is always answered earlier or later for the violence like natural way to catch it and that is precisely this cruel chain of stimulus and answer the one that makes her fearsome and impels to try to avoid him in the possible thing.
Bruno Bettelheim offers an advice to the educator in this sense: "If we allow the children to speak frankly about his aggressive tendencies, also they will go so far as to recognize the fearsome of such tendencies. Only this class of recognition can drive to something better than, on the one hand the denial and repression, and for other, an explosion in the shape of violent acts. This way the education can inspire the conviction of which one himself is protected, and to avoid fearsome experiences, it is necessary to confront constructively the tendencies to the violence, so much the proper ones like the foreign ones."
WHAT DOCTOR CAN TREAT ME?
|
INFORMATION 
