|
 DEFINITION
It is true that each one has his moral, personal and non-transferable conscience, nevertheless we can speak about ethical superiority of certain values. Intelligible reasons can be given in favor of the sincerity and against the trick or in favor of the support to the dweeb opposite to his annihilation. To understand on the other hand the motives for which the masturbation is a serious sin or the blood transfusions they are abominable it demands faith in mysterious revelations in which not the whole world is ready to believe. Certainly those who make these convictions his must be respected and have right to behave according to his excellence boss.
The ethics differ from the religion in his target (the first one wants a better life and the second one slightly better than the life), and in his method (the first one bases on reason and the experience and the second one in the revelation). Also the ethics are a thing of all, while the religion is a question of a few, for many that are: the religious persons also have ethical interests, while not always the opposite happens.
The ethics and the religion serve to exemplify before the students the difference between those rational beginning that we all can comprise and share (without stopping being critics) opposite to very respectable doctrines but which alone indemonstrable mystery a few they accept like valid.
RELIGIOUS EDUCATION?
At present it is considered to be a personal option of the parents that the state must respect, but that it is not forced to finance. The study plans can include a subject of the type "history of the religions", with preferable attention to the Christian Greek-Roman tradition for his relevancy to understand our culture. But it must not be prescriptive, but descriptive, informative. And certainly it must not be in charge of a special body of teachers linked to the episcopate, but specialists in philosophy history or anthropology. Only this way it will be able to be evaluated académicamente as any other one, since the good faith does not admit earthly punctuations. His inclusion or not in the study plans he must attend on the same considerations as another teaching matter, not whom the agreements use like argument with a Church that proves to be headed by the foreign state.
WHAT DOCTOR CAN TREAT ME?
|
DEFINITION 
